Air domes: last of a dying breed?
Minneapolis’ Metrodome fabric roof may be the last of a dying breed.
Fabric Architecture | September 2010
By Mason Riddle
Are air-supported dome stadia dead? Has the characteristic “marshmallow-in-bondage” design had its day for multipurpose stadia? Many within the building industry, as well as professional sports teams and their fans, answer a decided “yes.” However, a few, such as David Campbell, principal and CEO of Geiger Engineers, say “not so fast.” Granted, Campbell works for the company that propelled the air-supported dome concept into the mainstream. But Campbell also sees a future for the design, one differing from the past.
The backstory
The air-supported dome “craze” was ignited when U.S. engineer David Geiger’s design for the U.S. Pavilion was built at Expo ’70 in Osaka Japan. This memorable structure spawned, among others, the 1975 Pontiac Silverdome, the 1980 Syracuse University Carrier Dome, the 1982 Hubert H Humphrey Metrodome, the 1983 Hoosier Dome, (now demolished), Vancouver’s 1983 BC Place Stadium and the 1988 Tokyo Dome, affectionately named “The Big Egg.”
What are the advantages? First, air-supported domes were—and still are—a cost-effective way of building a stadium, a fact that appealed three decades ago to cities that were counting their pennies. If a municipality or university determined it needed a roof, an air-supported dome was far cheaper than a fixed or retractable roof stadium and it could be constructed with relative expediency. The Metrodome cost $68 million, coming in $2 million under budget, a fantasy number when compared to current stadia. Air-supported domes also offer an unobstructed open interior space. Since there is no need for support columns, sports fans never miss a strikeout or interception. Additionally, an air-supported roof allows for the scheduling of multiple activities, from sports events to music concerts, civic gatherings to political events. A dome could then generate income year-round, in all weather.
“The economy of professional sports has changed since the early 1980s,” states Campbell, who worked as a design engineer on the Metrodome. “Much more capital is now spent on venues than 20 and 30 years ago, making the cost saving aspect of an air-supported dome far less relevant.” Geiger Engineers is currently reconstituting the BC Place Stadium with a retractable roof after decommissioning its air-supported dome following the 2010 Winter Olympics. “It is a huge decision to make. Retractable roof stadia are expensive and a “rare bird—maybe 25 in the entire world,” explains Campbell.
Issues?
So what are the issues? Foremost is that the professional sports culture—owners, teams, management, fans—has realized that multipurpose stadia serve no particular sport well, especially baseball. (Campbell notes the demise of many multipurpose stadia in the last decade, even those without an air-supported dome such as Busch Stadium in St. Louis.) Not only do baseball fans like to watch their team in rain or shine, but each field is uniquely sized. The dimensions of a baseball field vary stadium by stadium, and that adds to a team’s identity and the game’s drama. Irregular dimensions are not easily accommodated in the strict configuration of an air-supported dome. Football, because of its regulation size field, fares better. Moreover, most sports franchises realize that it is next to impossible for an air-supported dome to provide the amenities now expected by the public, such as sophisticated digital technology, restaurants and bars, private loges and so on. In the 21st century, attending a sports event is more than simply going to see a team play. It is being indoors and outdoors all at once.
A second issue is the public perception that air-supported domes can “collapse” and are thus dangerous. This is simply not true. An air-supported dome has never collapsed and, in fact, a dome cannot collapse on people. But it can deflate and that has happened —occasionally—due to climatic conditions such as snow and ice. Campbell emphasizes that air-supported dome stadia are active systems, not passive systems like open air or fixed roof facilities. Consequently, they rely on people to actively manage or monitor them 24/7, and people make mistakes. When active systems are well managed, and Campbell notes that this is now being done extremely well in most domes, a deflation incident is rare. The Tokyo Dome has never had a deflation.
With regard to energy use, an air-supported dome cannot attain the insulation values of hard-walled structures, thus increasing heating and cooling costs. Although fans must operate continually to keep the structure pressurized, a larger cost and use of energy is to initiate the snowmelt system. Someone must make the decision to activate the system before an impending snow or ice storm. If that storm never materializes, a substantial waste of energy and money is incurred.*
Does Campbell believe there is a future for air-supported dome stadia? “Yes, definitely, but not in the area of professional sports in North America,” he states. “Our teams want to distinguish themselves and they want to be outside, not under a dome.” However, he notes that Geiger Engineers has done preliminary designs for air-supported domes for universities and other clients, although none has been built. A university may have a need for a multipurpose facility that offers shelter. Campbell adds that air-supported domes may be desirable in a sports market in other countries, where capitalization options are not as great as in the U.S. But, states Campbell, “It all comes back to one initial question ‘Why do I want a roof?’”
As a Twin Cities resident (Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minn.), I have lived, at least metaphorically, in the shadow of the Metrodome. I attended the Dome’s public debut, the Minnesota Twins’ 1982 home opener. Last fall, the Twins departed for its new state-of-the-art Target Field on the other side of downtown Minneapolis, I don’t miss the Dome for baseball, but it is history.
Mason Riddle is a contributing editor for Fabric Architecture. Her piece on a Bard College canopy appeared in the May/June issue.
*“Turning on a snowmelt system is very costly,” states Campbell. “Although far more continuous in operation, illuminating the arena and powering the fans may be less expensive than turning on a snowmelt over the course of a year.”
RSS
Twitter
Facebook
Comments
Comments are the opinion of individual posters and do not reflect the views of Fabric Architecture or Industrial Fabrics Association International.
10:47 pm CDT
AIR DOME ARE GREAT IN ANY CLIMATE! UP TO 200 MI PER HR WIND-LOAD!
4:02 pm CST
*WRONG! AIR DOMES ARE HERE TO STAY! MISTAKES WE'RE MADE IN METRODOME!!
I BEG YOUR PARDEN!
THIS DOME WAS THE PROBLEMS:
A.-WRONG DESIGN! TOP SYOULD HAVE BEEN MORE ROUNDED, WITH MORE CABLE!
B.-THE HEAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN HIGH ENOUGH TO WARM THE MEMBRANE..AND MELT THE SNOW!
C.-DID SOMEONE TURN UP THE AIR PRESSURE...AND BLOW THE TOP OUT??
D.-IT WAS MAINTAINED WRONG..OR NOT AT ALL!
*THE LARGEST DOME IN THE WORLD, WAS UP FOR 8 YRS, IN ALASKA, UNTIL RECENTLY! NO PROBLEM!
PROVE ME WRONG-
BUFORD DOWELL /DIR,
EAGLE INT. TENTS & AIR DOMES,
GREATTENTS77@YAHOO.COM
____________________________
12:32 am CDT
Is there a role for air supported domes in warmer climates
I write from Singapore. Where its hot - more often than not, too hot for outdoor sports. For a game of 5-a-side soccer (which is immensely popular here), the only decent playing hours would be up to 10am in the morning and from 5pm in the evening. Anytime in between that and you would be silly to be playing outdoors. This too is not just part of the year but throughout the year.
So for a sports faclity, it makes sense to take the game indoors - sheltered from the heat and the rain (which is so heavy its another obstacle to outdoor sports).
I am wondering if the air dome would be suitable for such weather. Would need to change the heating to some sort of cooling system though.
5:17 pm CDT
Tension Membrane 'An Alternative' To Air Supported Domes
While an interesting article, Mr. Campbell missed an excellent opportunity to mention Tension Membrane Roof/Canopy Structures as the State of the Art replacement for air domes. What better venue than Fabric Architecture online.
Submit a Comment