Connections and detailing: Part 2

March 1st, 2000 / By: / Hardware & Rigging

Well-designed details can make fabric roof construction relatively easy and elegant in appearance.

Cable Saddles

Part 1 of this article described some of the special detailing problems related to cable terminations. Special detailing is also required when cables pass without termination over supporting members or intersect other cables, where a saddle is required to guide its changes of angle. The primary considerations in designing saddles are the size of and tensile forces in the cable, the cable’s range of directional orientation under load, and whether or not the cable must be restrained from sliding across the saddle. (This is done in order to effectively realize an analytically-determined change in cable force in the sections of cable to either side of the saddle.)

In general, the large bending radius of structural strand precludes its use with saddles, and the designer must specify more flexible wire rope. The determination of saddle radius is a critical design decision (Figure 1). A radius that is too small will reduce the effective cable strength, while one that is too large yields a saddle of unwieldy size. The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) specifies a minimum saddle radius equal to 15 times cable diameter in order to realize the full cable strength and allows no saddle radius less than 10 times cable diameter, for which it requires a 25 percent reduction in design strength.1

Conformance to this standard results in saddles of enormous width where the cable passes through a large angle change. Certain industry publications allow much tighter bending radii. Crosby, for example, recommends the same 25 percent reduction in cable allowable load where bend radius is only twice cable diameter.2 The author is not aware of problems resulting from the use of such tighter radii, though designers need beware of cable fatigue problems that will occur with small radius saddles in designs where the cable may work itself back and forth over the saddles under variable loads.

Careful saddle design considers not only the orientation of the cable to each side of the saddle, but also the range of motion that the cable goes through under load, and ensures that the saddle is configured so that the cable never binds against sharp plate edges. In some cases, the curvature of the cable relative to the orientation of the saddle plate or plates results in the need not only to round the edge of the saddle but also to bend the plate out of plane. Where the cable angle change across the saddle is large, the detail must provide some form of corner termination for the fabric (Figure 2).

In addition to providing an appropriately curved bearing surface for the cable, saddles typically provide some form of “keeper” to prevent the cable from popping out of the saddle during erection or under extreme loading. The keeper may be as simple as a shackle pinned through the saddle plate to capture the cable in position (Figure 3). The complex requirements of some saddle designs test the skills of good designers to develop connections that not only perform well structurally but also are economical and visually elegant. The best designers configure the structure to avoid such complex connection design requirements in the first place.

Mast Top Connections

Structural Considerations

The mast peak connection must perform several structural functions. First, the radial tension forces in the fabric must be collected and delivered, without stress concentration, into the mast. The fabric often necks down to something approaching a point at the top of a mast, and fabric stresses must be transferred over narrow lengths and often at locations confined by cable terminations. Sharply peaked tent cones generally occur only in the mind of the artist, and the designer must satisfy both the structural and visual problems associated with the design of the tension ring.

The mast peak connection must also provide a mechanism for anchorage of any radial cables that underlie the fabric, either through fastening them to the tension ring or directly to the mast peak itself. Where external cabling is used to stabilize the mast peaks or for some other purpose, it, too, must be fastened to the mast. Lastly, mast peaks are commonly used as the location for membrane tensioning devices.3

Fabric termination at the top of the mast may be accomplished (as discussed in Part 1 of this article) at minimal expense by securing a roped edge between pairs of clamp plates that in turn fasten to jaw end turnbuckles attached to ear plates on the mast (Figure 4). The clamp bars are jointed to allow the fabric to articulate around radial or ridge cables coming to the mast peak. These cables are generally terminated either at ears welded to the mast or (where tensioning is done at the mast peak) to a pipe sleeve that rides over the mast.

This approach can provide an inexpensive fabric termination well suited to roofs with highly irregular shapes at the peak, and the turnbuckles provide easy adjustment to accommodate localized irregularities. However, care must be taken in their detailing and erection in order to avoid fabric tears due to stress concentration or sharp edges at the clamp bar joints.

Alternatively, the fabric terminates at a rigid ring constructed with a rolled steel tube or similar member. Radial and ridge cables terminate at ears welded to the ring, which is suspended from the mast peak by turnbuckles (Figure 5).

German designers, led by Frei Otto and his pioneering team of designers, developed a very different approach to the design of the mast peak connection. By supporting a steel cable loop from the peak of the mast, the top edge of the fabric is attached to the cable in order to distribute its stress over an appropriate length.4 When used in cable net structures, as per the original German application, the cables in the net are fixed to the cable loop with clamps in a manner that allows transfer of the tension in the net into the entire length of the loop. In a pure fabric membrane that terminates in a conventional cable cuff, however, the fabric can slip down the sides of the loop in a manner that prevents the transfer of membrane tension without stress concentration. Stiff webbing connected to the mast peak and sewn to the fabric alongside the cable may alleviate the problem. (Figure 3).

Non-Structural Considerations

The mast peak performs important non-structural functions, as well. Sometimes, it is designed to allow ventilation of hot rising air through the inside of the tension ring (with or without the addition of a cap configured to keep out rainwater), while others are sealed against both air ventilation and water infiltration. Mast peak design must carefully address aesthetics, as well, because the mast peak’s position at the top of the structure and its function as the point of transference between membrane tension and mast compression makes it a visual singularity whose natural drama ought best to complement the inherent bravura of the cone form itself.5

The non-structural requirements of the mast peak have been addressed in widely divergent ways on different projects. In 1973, Birdair completed installation of the roof of the La Verne University Campus Center, the first structure to use a PTFE-coated fiberglass fabric roof. As designed by architect The Shaver Partnership and structural engineers Bob D. Campbell and Lin Kulka Tang & Associates, the finished roof gives no visual hint of the transfer of load from the fabric and cabling into the mast, because the entire connection is covered by a steel baffle (Figure 6). The baffle itself, is a cone shaped to continue the curve of the terminated fabric upward from the tension ring to a sharp peak. The mast peak design reflects a sculptural approach that offers no clue as to the configuration of the structure that underlies it.

While structurally ambiguous, the LaVerne cones are sculpturally appropriate and pleasing. Other approaches have proven less so, as at Florida Festival, where the tension ring and mast peak are hidden by a hemispherical glazed dome reminiscent of the gun turret on a World War II bomber (Figures 7 & 8).

Cable loops can maintain the drama of the sharply peaked cone, where desired, while adding the elegant curve of the loop. The designs clearly express the collection of fabric tension and its transfer into the mast. However the cable loop has drawbacks when it is necessary to close off the area within the cable loop to provide a weathertight roof. On some structures, clear acrylic has been used, but the difficulty of providing a correctly curved edge and maintaining a weathertight seal to the flexible cable must be overcome.

Extending the mast up well beyond the top of the fabric and the tension ring has sometimes increased the dramatic impact of the mast peak. The results often appear contrived. At the stadium in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia (Figure 9), the cylindrical structural masts terminate at the elevation of the tension ring. During construction, immediately following the prestressing of the fabric over the masts, the structure had an elegant but lively beauty. To complete construction, slender mast extensions were secured atop the tension rings. The daggerlike forms, reminiscent of ancient minarets, are a disappointing addition to the structurally expressive and modern design, created by architect Ian Fraser and engineers Horst Berger Partners and Schlaich Bergerman & Partners.

The vertical orientation of the Riyadh mast and its extension also requires comment. Masts are most efficiently constructed so that they align with the resultant of the accumulated forces at the peak of the fabric. External cabling to the top of the mast serves primarily to stabilize it in the event of a strong wind load or a tear in the fabric. At Riyadh, though, the resultant of the fabric membrane shape pulls markedly inward at its peak while the mast is vertical in order to satisfy non-structural considerations, so that the external stay cables must perform the additional function of resisting the horizontal resultant force at the top of the mast.

A highly successful use of the extended mast was made on the Independence Mall Pavilion erected in Philadelphia for the 1976 United States bicentennial (Figure 10). The aesthetic here, as created by architect H2L2 and structural engineer Geiger Berger, has a strong structural element, as the exposed cabling carries its tension from the fabric to the mast as palpably as a halyard raising a mainsail.6

Mast Base Connections

The connection at the base of the mast requires only the termination of a single compression member, without the complexities of fabric and cable termination that occur at the mast peak. While the technical requirements of the mast base are simple, it too is an important visual element in the design, and one whose refinement is made more important by its proximity to viewers at grade level.

The fundamental design variable in the mast base design lies in the “degree of freedom” of the connection. Depending on its configuration, the mast may be fixed in a manner that prevents rotation about its base, or it may be allowed to rotate about one or both axes of the mast.

Fixed bases have the advantage of allowing the mast to stand vertical like a flagpole during erection, without benefit of any guying cables, and they are appropriate where lateral movements at the top of the mast do not induce excessive bending in the mast or where it is not possible to use guys or other devices to resist lateral loads at the top of the mast. The most prominent of all fabric structure fixed mast bases is that on the 170m-high tower from which the Montreal Stadium membrane is suspended (Figure 11). As designed by the French architect Roger Taillibert, the massiveness of this tower relates less to its structural function than its architectural roles of enclosing space and giving form. It is nonetheless a heavy-handed sculptural element, and ill-suited to the visually delicate membrane that it supports. On masts of modest size, fixed bases are typically achieved by welding a steel mast directly to its base plate and securing the base with broadly spaced anchor bolts to a foundation designed against overturning.

Single degree of freedom bases are useful in applications such as posts at the perimeter of a structure where the roof is tensioned by shortening tie back cables in a manner that displaces the top of the post outward (Figure 12). In a manner analogous to a cable jaw end, a single degree of freedom mast base can be achieved by knifing a plate welded vertically to either the mast or the base plate between a pair of plates welded to the opposing element.

Mast bases with two degrees of freedom allow the top of the member to displace freely about both its axes, as is required when such displacements may occur either during erection or in service. Bases that are true “pins” may be created with spherical bearing plates. Mast bases that are stable over wide angle changes about both axes are sometimes required for deployable roofs, and may be created with mechanical gimbals.

Adequate rotational capacity can generally be obtained with a reduction in both expense and visual expressiveness by placing a pad of elastomeric or other flexible material between the mast bottom plate and the base plate resting atop the foundation. In our design for the Weber Point Events Center, we gave visual expression to the pinned mast base by tapering the cruciform mast base to a small diameter at its bearing on the base plate (Figure 13). If such mast bases rest on the base plate without positive securement to it, it is important to assure that the mast has compressive load throughout erection and under all load cases, so that the mast cannot pop out of its bearing.

Craig G. Huntington, a structural engineer, is president of Huntington Design Associates Inc., Oakland, Calif., and a regular contributor to Fabric Architecture.
Excerpted by permission from The Tensioned Fabric Roof, a forthcoming book by the author to be published by American Society of Civil Engineers Press.

References

1. ASCE 1997. Structural Applications of Steel Cables for Building, ASCE 19–96. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers,

2. Crosby 1998. Product literature. The Crosby Group, Inc.

3. Huntington, Craig. G. 1992. “Tensioned Fabric Structures,” Construction India, 1992 Annual. Bombay: The Indian & Eastern Engineer Publishing, 87–89.

4. Ibid.

5. Huntington, Craig. G. 1989. “Manipulation of Shell and Fabric Roof Form.” Proceedings of the Sessions Related to Steel Structures at the 1989 American Society of Civil Engineers Stuctures Congress. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers, 706–715.

6. Huntington, Craig. G. 1992. Ibid.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *